PMSP for Pulse Crops (Chickpeas, Lentils, and Dry Peas) in the United States

Source

Title PMSP for Pulse Crops (Chickpeas, Lentils, and Dry Peas) in the United States
PDF Document https://ipmdata.ipmcenters.org/documents/pmsps/2016PulsePMSP_FINAL.pdf
Source Type Pest Management Strategic Plans
Source Date 06/19/2017
Settings Chickpea, Lentil, Pea, Dry, Pulse
Region Western
States Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Washington
Contacts Mary Burrows, Montana State University-Bozeman, mburrows@montana.edu
Ronda Hirnyck, University of Idaho, rhirnyck@uidaho.edu, (208) 364-4046
Contributors bright Agindotan, Montana State University-Bozeman
Ruth Beck, South Dakota State University
Ian Burke, Washington State University
Mary Burrows, Montana State University-Bozeman
Chengci Chen, Montana State University-Bozeman
Weidong Chen, USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
Frankie Crutcher, Montana State University-Bozeman
Sanford Eigenbrode, University of Idaho
Brian Jenks, North Dakota State University
Rebecca McGee, USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
Kevin McPhee, North Dakota State University
Perry Miller, Montana State University-Bozeman
Jerry Neufeld, University of Idaho
Julie Pasche, North Dakota State University
Lyndon Porter, USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
Gadi Reddy, Montana State University-Bozeman
George Vandemark, USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
Michael Wunsch, North Dakota State University

PDF

https://ipmdata.ipmcenters.org/documents/pmsps/2016PulsePMSP_FINAL.pdf

Settings/Crops

Description

Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum)
Chickpeas are an annual grain legume. They come in two types, “desi” and “kabuli,” based on seed size, color, and the thickness and shape of the seed coat. (See the USA Dry Pea & Lentil Council’s website at http://usapulses.org for photos illustrating various types of pulses.)

Desi types are usually smaller, angular seeds with thick seed coats that range in color from light tan and speckled to solid black. Desi chickpeas require a specialized seed-coat-removal process if used for human food. The process, called decortication, requires adjusting the moisture level of the seeds to facilitate the mechanical removal of the thick seed coat. The seeds, which after decortication resemble a small yellow pea, are processed into numerous South Asian ethnic food products.


Kabuli types, also known as “garbanzo beans” in the United States, are larger seeds with paperthin seed coats that range in color from white to pale cream-color to tan. In North America, most kabuli chickpeas are marketed as canned chickpeas for salads or as hummus. Kabuli chickpeas are also marketed as dry chickpeas and ground flour.


In the United States, chickpeas are grown primarily in the Pacific Northwest and Northern Plains, with some production in California, the High Plains, and Arizona. Chickpea plants are erect with primary, secondary, and tertiary branching, resembling a small bush. They flower profusely and have an indeterminate growth habit, continuing to flower and set pods as long as conditions are favorable. Pod set occurs on the primary and secondary
branches and on the main stem. The individual round pods generally contain one seed in kabuli types and often two seeds in desi types. Chickpeas have deeper taproots than peas and lentils, which gives them an advantage in moisture-deficient areas.


Lentils (Lens culinaris)
Lentil plants are herbaceous, with slender stems and branches. Plant height ranges from 12 to 15 inches for most varieties, but can vary from 8 to 30 inches depending on variety and environment. Plants have a slender taproot with fibrous lateral roots. Rooting patterns range from a many-branched, shallow root system to types that are less branched and more deeply rooted. The taproot and lateral roots in surface layers of the soil have nodules that vary in shape from round to elongate. Stems of lentil plants are square and ribbed and usually thin and weak. Branches arise directly from the main stem and may emerge from the cotyledonary node below
ground or from nodes above ground. Leaves are relatively small compared to those of other large-seeded food legumes. Pods are oblong, laterally compressed, and approximately ¼ to ¾ inch long and 1/8 to 3/8 inch wide; they usually contain one or two lens-shaped seeds. Seed diameter of varieties commonly grown in the United States ranges from around 1/8 inch to a little over ¼ inch and colors range from light green or greenish red to gray, tan, brown, or black. Purple and black mottling and speckling of seeds are common in some varieties. In the United States, lentils are grown primarily in the Pacific Northwest and Northern Plains. Several market classes of lentils are grown in these regions, based on seed size, cotyledon color, and seed coat coloration.

Dry Peas (Pisum sativum and P. sativum spp. arvense)
Dry peas are a cool-season annual crop produced primarily in the Northern Plains, High Plains, and Pacific Northwest, with scattered production in northern California, Nevada, Arizona, New England, and a few other states. Also known as “field peas,” they differ from succulent peas in that dry peas are marketed as dry, shelled products for either human food or livestock feed, whereas succulent peas are marketed as fresh or canned vegetables. There are two main types of dry peas. One type has normal leaves and vine length of 3 to 6 feet. The second type is semileafless (with modified leaflets) with shorter vine lengths of 2 to 4 feet.

Fall-planted peas – peas planted in the fall with a tolerance to winter temperatures – of the green and yellow market classes have been released for both feed markets and, more recently, for food markets. Fall-planted peas also show promise as a cover crop in all regions of North America. Austrian winter peas are raised for forage and specialty feeding applications. Fall-planted peas provide producers with significantly improved yields, possible adaptability to drought or summer season heat due to earlier bloom dates, earlier harvest potential, and longer-term nitrogen fixation for better soil health. Fall-planted pea acres are expected to expand across current
growing regions and to provide additional pulse acres in summer fallow/winter wheat rotations. Depending on the variety, dry peas start flowering after a specific number of nodes are reached
and flowering continues until moisture or nitrogen deficiency brings it to an end. Dry pea varieties have either a determinate or indeterminate flowering habit. Determinate varieties mature in 80 to 90 days, indeterminate varieties in 90 to 100 days. Dry pea harvest begins in late July (for spring-planted peas), when pods are dry and seed moisture is 8% to 18%, depending upon the growing region. They are combined directly in the field. A timely harvest is important to avoid post-maturity disease, seed bleaching, and seed shatter

Crop Stages in Brief
This section summarizes the general activities and production considerations in pulse crops at each crop stage. Activities and considerations specific to management of weeds, diseases, insects, nematodes, and vertebrate pests are discussed in the section devoted to that pest under Pulse Pests and Management Options, following this section.

Pre-Plant
Pulses are often grown in rotation with other crops. As rotation partners, pulses offer several agronomic and economic advantages. Cereal crop yields often increase when planted after legumes because cereal pest cycles have been disrupted. Legume crops enable use of different herbicides than the cereal crops to clean up grassy weeds. Legumes conserve soil moisture and limit soil erosion by offering an option other than summer fallow. Finally, pulses increase the nitrogen content of the soil.


Field history and crop rotation are important pest management considerations in pulse production, particularly with respect to weeds. The decision to grow pulses in a given field is typically made one to three years in advance to allow for proper site preparation, rotation partner selection, and plant-back considerations. Weed control is critical in pulses because they are slow to establish, produce limited vegetative growth, and do not compete strongly with weeds. A carefully considered crop rotation scheme, which may include chemical fallow, can help decrease weed populations. Grass weeds are easier than broadleaf weeds to manage in pulses,
therefore pulse growers tend to avoid fields with a history of broadleaf perennial weed problems.

Many herbicides used in small-grain production may persist in the soil, resulting in pulse crop injury and yield loss. Rotational intervals depend in part upon how long herbicides remain in the soil. Factors that affect herbicide persistence include soil pH, moisture, temperature, texture, and organic matter. In areas with a dry climate and short growing season, herbicides generally degrade slower than in warmer, moister areas. Sulfonylurea herbicides persist longer in higher pH soils. When soil pH exceeds 7.5 to 7.9, sulfonylurea residues may remain in the soil much longer than described on the label. Under such conditions, a field bioassay is required the year
before seeding pulses. Pulses are best grown following a cereal rather than a crop that can harbor pulse diseases such as botrytis, powdery mildew, aphanomyces root rot, and fusarium root rot caused by species
specific to pulses. Pulse crops are susceptible to diseases that can overwinter in the soil and in stubble. These considerations are important in management of weeds and diseases and in minimizing residual herbicide injury to the crop.


Planting
Variety selection at planting is critical to the success of the crop. It is imperative that varieties with general adaptation to the region be identified as well as varieties that best counter the stresses in a given field. End uses and markets need to be considered as some varieties fit very specific market niches. As new varieties are developed, testing programs to assure their performance in each region will be needed.

Lentils, dry peas, and desi chickpeas are cool-season crops that can be seeded early into cool soils (40°F); kabuli chickpeas require warmer soils (46-50°F). The rate at which the soil warms affects early crop vigor, which in turn affects the plants’ tolerance of weeds and diseases. Pulse crops can be planted under conventional, minimum-till, or no-till production systems. Direct seeding techniques and low-till and no-till techniques can be very effective for pulse production. Extended rotations are especially important in direct seeding systems to reduce the spread of disease from intact residues on the soil surface and to allow for a slower breakdown of residual herbicides.

Pulse crops generally follow winter wheat or spring barley. Cereal stubble that is plowed or chiseled in the fall is cultivated for weed control and herbicide incorporation, then harrowed and rolled. (Pulse beds are also rolled after planting, which is discussed in the “Preemergence” section below.) Growers try to avoid excessive tillage in the spring to prevent drying out the seedbed. Most pulse seeds can emerge from deep seeding depths due to their large size. However, deep seeding is not required, provided that the seed is accurately placed in firm, moist soil. Seeding depth is also determined by herbicide incorporation depth. In direct-seeding systems, the seed is
placed at a shallower depth than systems utilizing pre-tilled soils, as soil moisture is usually much higher in untilled soils. Direct seeding and low-till and no-till methods have distinct advantages. Mulch from surface residue changes surface ecology. The soil aeration changes, which in turn facilitates water passthrough and favors certain organisms. The resulting improved soil tends to promote plant health, and healthy plants are better able to resist pest pressure. There are, however, a few drawbacks to direct seeding and low-till/no-till techniques. Pulse crops grown under these systems have a greater reliance on non-selective herbicides such as glyphosate (Roundup Ultra). Low-till and no-till systems limit the ability to incorporate pesticides, which is required with some herbicides. Also, the untilled residues remaining on the soil surface from the previous crop may tie up residual herbicides, rendering them ineffective.


Preemergence
After planting, pulse crop beds are rolled to smooth the soil surface. This field operation improves the harvesting of low-hanging pulse pods by reducing harvest losses and breakage of sickle section and guards, and improves harvest rate. Rolling is done anytime from immediately after seeding up to the 5- to 7-node stage in lentils and up to the 5-leaf stage in peas. Chickpea beds are rolled prior to emergence only.

Emergence to Harvest
Pulse crops have a low growth habit and low pod set. This affects the practicality of mid- to lateseason mechanical weed control and often necessitates specialized attachments for combine headers to allow mechanical harvest. Some lentils and dry peas are swathed or desiccated prior to harvest due to uneven maturity or weed infestation, an operation that also requires specialized combine attachments. Chickpeas may be swathed prior to harvest, but this is less common. Fields are inspected prior to harvest for variety characteristics and certifiability of seed.

Harvest
Harvest of pulse crops takes place once the crop has matured and dried out to a certain moisture level. Harvest date depends upon crop and region (see Activity Tables, Appendix A). Drying usually occurs naturally, but desiccant herbicides may be used in years with warm, wet springs and cool, wet summers that promote luxuriant plant growth. Under such conditions the crop will continue to flower and set pods and weeds will continue to grow as long as moisture is available. If growers wait for natural dry down to occur under such high-moisture conditions, they risk pod shattering, sprouting, seed coat slough, and seed bleaching. Sometimes application of desiccants is limited to “green spots” within a field. In years when weeds are less threatening, dry peas and lentils are mechanically swathed or direct combined. Timely harvest of dry peas and lentils is critical to avoid post-maturity disease.


Post-Harvest, Shipping and Storage
Even though peas and chickpeas produce a limited amount of crop residue, they develop one of the best seedbeds for subsequent crops with direct-seed cropping systems. The high nitrogen to carbon ratio of pulses provides a nitrogen benefit to non-legume crops in the system and reduces the need for nitrogen fertilizer application. Following removal of the crop, typical operations include: sampling for certified seed, applying perennial weed controls, heavy harrowing to manage residue (in some regions), fertilization for the next season’s crop, and pre-plant chemical application and incorporation for the next crop. After the crop leaves the field, it is stored (warehoused) and monitored. Seed moisture must be carefully controlled (typically in the range of 12 to 14%) to prevent storage molds, spoilage, heat damage, insect damage, and unintentional germination. Moisture is tested several times during the first few weeks of storage to maintain proper levels and to prevent seed sweating. If moisture levels are too high, bin aeration may be employed. Aeration cools and dries the seed to forestall
storage problems. It is important to make sure the fan size is appropriate to the bin size and the crop. Grain dryers are sometimes used on chickpea, but they must be used with extreme caution because they may cause mechanical and thermal damage to the crop.

Crop Cycles Per Year
1

Background

Introduction
Edible seeds of legumes are known as pulses. They include peas, beans, lentils, and chickpeas. The term “pulse” comes from the Latin word “puls,” which means a thick soup. Pea, lentil, and chickpea species are part of the larger plant family known as the Fabaceae or legume family. The Fabaceae family includes about 600 genera and 13,000 species, making it the third largest family within the plant kingdom. This family includes cultivated species such as alfalfa, soybeans, and many edible beans. For the purposes of this document, the term “pulse crops” will represent chickpeas, lentils, and dry peas. No other pulse crops will be included in the discussions.
Pulses are considered environmentally friendly because of their reduced dependence on fossil fuels. Instead of requiring fertilizer applications, they are able to obtain much of their nitrogen requirement from the atmosphere by forming a symbiotic relationship with Rhizobium or Mesorhizobium bacteria in the soil. Pulse crops’ low crop residues and low carbon-to-nitrogen ratios eliminate the need for burning and make rotating to the next crop using reduced tillage very easy.


Pulse crops have a hypogeal type of germination meaning that the seed leaves (cotyledons) remain below ground. Soybeans and dry beans have an epigeal type of germination, which means the seed leaves emerge from the soil. Hypogeal germination makes pulse crops more frost-tolerant than soybeans or dry beans. Additionally, pulse crops are more tolerant of postplant, preemergence, or early postemergence tillage operations such as harrowing, culti-packing, or rotary hoeing (each of which disturbs the soil) than are soybeans or dry beans. Later (midseason to late-season) mechanical operations are less practical because of the crops’ low growth
habit and pod set. Pulse crops are an important food source in developing nations and, increasingly, a popular food in the U.S. and other developed nations as their nutritive qualities – high fiber, low fat, high protein, low glycemic index – are recognized and appreciated. The United Nations declared 2016 as the International Year of Pulses (IYP 2016, http://ipy2016.org), to highlight the importance of pulse crops and the role they play in providing worldwide nutrition and food security. This made 2016 an especially appropriate year for pulse growers and other stakeholders to step forward and revisit the Pest Management Strategic Plan for the expanding and changing U.S. pulse industry.


Pulse growers in the United States recognize the importance of developing long-term strategies to address pest management needs. These strategies include identifying critical pesticide uses; retaining critical uses; researching pest management methods with emphasis on economically viable solutions; and understanding the impacts of pesticide cumulative risk. This document is designed to review and evaluate these strategies.

Work Group
A work group consisting of growers, breeders, pest control advisors, merchandisers, regulators, USDA-ARS personnel, and university specialists met for one-and-a-half days in Bozeman, Montana on November 9-10, 2016. The purpose of the meeting was to identify the current needs of pulse growers in terms of research, education, and regulatory actions regarding pesticides and other pest management tools. The result of this exercise was a list of critical needs, general conclusions, and tables listing the timing of operations and the efficacies of various controls for specific pests. These materials have been compiled and reviewed by work group members and are presented in this Pest Management Strategic Plan, the third such document in the evolving U.S. pulse crop industry. This document and its appendices are intended to serve as a comprehensive foundation for the continuing transition to more sustainable pest management in pulse crops in the United States.


Work Group Members
Bright Agindotan, Montana State University
Ruth Beck, South Dakota State University
Shannon Berndt, Northern Pulse Growers Association
Ian Burke, Washington State University
Mary Burrows, Montana State University
Charlie Cahill, Cahill Seeds*
Joan Campbell, University of Idaho
Chengci Chen, Montana State University*
Weidong Chen, USDA Agricultural Research Service*
Frankie Crutcher, Montana State University
Ed Davis, Montana State University
Sanford Eigenbrode, University of Idaho*
Justin Flaten, JM Grain
Scott Groepper, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service*
Brian Jenks, North Dakota State University
Janet Knodel, North Dakota State University
Rebecca McGee, USDA Agricultural Research Service*
Kevin McPhee, North Dakota State University*
Perry Miller, Montana State University
Howard Nelson, Central Washington Grain Growers
Jerry Neufeld, University of Idaho
David Oien, Timeless Food
Julie Pasche, North Dakota State University*

Lyndon Porter, USDA Agricultural Research Service
Nancy Powell, ProGene Plant Research
Gadi V.P. Reddy, Montana State University
Jessica Rupp, Montana State University
Roger Sammons, Pardue Grain
Todd Scholz, USA Dry Pea and Lentil Council
George Vandemark, USDA Agricultural Research Service
Stephen Vantassel, Montana Department of Agriculture*
Michael Wunsch, North Dakota State University*
Guiping Yan, North Dakota State University*
*Indicates work group participant not present at workshop but active in final document.


Observers/Others Present at Workshop
Facilitator: Ronda Hirnyck, University of Idaho
U.S. EPA Representative: Neil Anderson Western IPM Center: Amanda Crump
Recorder: Carmen Murphy, Montana State University
Document Author/Editor: Sally O’Neal, Communications Specialist

Pest Management

Critical Pest Management Needs Summary by Crop
The following list summarizes those needs determined by the work group to be the most critical to pulse crop pest management in 2016.


CHICKPEAS
Research
• Develop Ascochyta blight-resistant varieties.
• Identify new chemistries for fungicide resistance management with a particular focus on metalaxyl-resistant Pythium spp.
• Identify chemistries with alternate modes of action with efficacy against Ascochyta blight of chickpeas.
• Expand insecticide options.
• Continue evaluating currently registered insecticide products.
• Review economic thresholds for insects and develop thresholds for insect pests that do not have thresholds.
• Increase biological control and pheromone-based monitoring/trapping research.
• Expand herbicide options for broadleaf and grass weed management through continued evaluation of currently available products and by breeding for tolerance to herbicides.
• Expand management options for priority weed species.
• Prioritize and optimize cultural management inputs including seeding rate, row spacing, planting date, and crop rotation for improved crop competitiveness with weeds.
• Focus on systems-based weed management strategies grounded in sound agroecological practices.
• Develop insect, disease, and weed pest-forecasting models and decision-support tools.


Education
• Identification and sustainable management of diseases: variety resistance list, crop rotation lists or tables, flip cards for varieties, forecasting.
• Increase grower awareness of IPM practices in weed and insect management.
• Increase grower awareness of pollinators and pollinator safety.
• Herbicide resistance management and residue carryover education.
• Weed management IPM.

LENTILS
Research
• Identify root rot pathogens.
• Develop improved management strategies for Fusarium and Aphanomyces root rots.
• Develop rigorous fungicide-usage recommendations for management of white mold, including application timing, methods, and technology (spray pattern, droplet size, pressure, water volume); understand relative efficacy of applications made shortly before vs. shortly after canopy closure.
• Identify viruses and determine resistant varieties.
• Expand insecticide options.
• Continue evaluating currently registered insecticide products.
• Review economic thresholds for insects and develop thresholds for insect pests that do not have thresholds.
• Increase biological control and pheromone-based monitoring/trapping research.
• Expand herbicide options for broadleaf and grass weed management through continued evaluation of currently available products and by breeding for tolerance to herbicides.
• Expand management options for priority weed species.
• Prioritize and optimize cultural management inputs including seeding rate, row spacing, planting date, and crop rotation for improved crop competitiveness with weeds.
• Focus on systems-based weed management strategies grounded in sound agroecological practices.
• Develop insect, disease (white mold), and weed pest-forecasting models and decision support tools.

Education
• Identification and sustainable management of diseases: variety resistance list, crop rotation lists or tables, flip cards for varieties, forecasting.
• Increase grower awareness of IPM practices in insect management.
• Increase grower awareness of pollinators and pollinator safety.
• Herbicide resistance management and residue carryover education.
• Weed management IPM.

DRY PEAS
Research
• Research management of Fusarium species complex (identification, variety resistance, fungicide efficacy).
• Investigate pathogen movement in seed and seed treatments for management.
• Quantify soil and risk for root rot with an emphasis on Aphanomyces.
• Develop improved management strategies for Aphanomyces root rot.
• Identify fungicides with different modes of action for Ascochyta blight management in field peas.
• Develop thresholds for seed-borne Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi and other causal agents of bacterial blight in field pea seed (like Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae); evaluate the efficacy of seed treatment with streptomycin for management of seedborne bacterial blight pathogens.
• Develop thresholds for Pea seed-borne mosaic virus and improve detection methods to include new strains.
• Expand insecticide options; continue evaluating currently registered insecticides.
• Review economic thresholds for insects and develop thresholds for insect pests that do not have thresholds.
• Increase biological control and pheromone-based monitoring/trapping research.
• Expand herbicide options for broadleaf and grass weed management through continued evaluation of currently available products and by breeding for tolerance to herbicides.
• Prioritize/optimize cultural management inputs including seeding rate, row spacing, planting date, and crop rotation for improved crop competitiveness with weeds.
• Focus on systems-based weed management strategies grounded in sound agroecological practices.
• Develop insect, disease, and weed pest-forecasting models and decision-support tools.

Education
• Identification and sustainable management of diseases: variety resistance list, crop rotation lists or tables, flip cards for varieties, forecasting.
• Educate growers on pea leaf weevil and pea weevil biology, ID, and management.
• Increase grower awareness of IPM practices in insect management.
• Increase grower awareness of pollinators and pollinator safety.
• Herbicide resistance management

Regulatory

Critical Regulatory Needs Summary by Crop

CHICKPEAS
• Understand pathogen movement in seed as related to phytosanitary trade barriers.
• Register fluazinam (Omega) for management of Ascochyta blight on chickpeas.
• Register diflubenzuron (Dimilin) for grasshopper control.
• Register pyridate (Tough).
• Register tribenuron (Express).
• Obtain USDA-APHIS permit to import Uscana senex from Brazil or Chile for control of pea weevil.

LENTILS
• Register fluazinam (Omega) for Anthracnose, Ascochyta, and Sclerotinia stem rot control.
• Understand pathogen movement in seed as related to phytosanitary trade barriers.
• Expedite flonicamid (Beleaf) registration for aphid and Lygus control (in the IR-4 pipeline).
• Register diflubenzuron (Dimilin) for grasshopper control.

FIELD PEA
• Understand pathogen movement in seed as related to phytosanitary trade barriers.
• Register ethaboxam (Intego Solo) for Aphanomyces root rot and metalaxyl-resistant Pythium spp.
• Register fluazinam (Omega) for Ascochyta blight control.
• Register diflubenzuron (Dimilin) for grasshopper control.
• Register tribenuron (Express).
• Register acifluorfen (pending confirmation of crop tolerance).

Priorities

Production Practices

Pests

Disclaimer: The active ingredients and efficacy ratings in this report are not recommendations. The information in this report was provided by the workshop participants as a cross-section of grower practices at that time. Please refer to the pesticide labels for recommendations.

Insects

INSECTS
Presented in alphabetical order.

Pathogens

Chickpeas, lentils, and dry peas are infected by a number of fungal, bacterial, and viral pathogens that can cause seed, pod, seedling, and root diseases. These diseases may result in reduced germination, stand, yield, and quality. In this section, we will discuss diseases common to pulse crops in the United States.

Weeds

The majority of pulse growers in the United States do not use tillage to control weeds. Most
growers use some form of minimum till or no-till to conserve soil moisture and reduce erosion.
However, some growers may use conventional tillage to control weeds mechanically, which also
allows incorporation of certain herbicides.
In no-till systems, weed control begins with fall, preplant, or preemergence herbicides. Winter
annual and perennial weeds are best controlled in the fall. A non-selective herbicide such as
glyphosate is typically applied alone or with other herbicides in the fall and spring to control
emerged weeds or for residual weed control.
In conventional tillage, fall or spring pre-seeding tillage is used to control weeds and to activate
some soil-incorporated herbicides. Spring tillage controls early-emerging summer annual weeds.
Shallow tillage avoids bringing weed seeds up near the soil surface where they are likely to
germinate. Excessive tillage dries the seedbed, making shallow seeding less effective, and also
leads to soil erosion.
Weeds are managed with stale seedbed techniques such as delaying seeding, allowing weeds to
emerge, and then destroying them with either tillage or a non-selective herbicide. However, some
weeds may be favored by delayed seeding. Delayed seeding may also diminish yield potential
and quality, so this disadvantage must be weighed against any weed-control advantage.
No single herbicide will control all broadleaf weeds in pulse crops. Perennial broadleaf weeds
like field bindweed and Canada thistle must be controlled in the previous crop (for example
wheat), through fall herbicide applications, and then spring burndown. Annual broadleaf weeds
such as kochia and Russian thistle can be difficult to control in pulse crops. Growers rely on soilapplied
herbicides to control annual weeds preplant or preemergence. However, these herbicides
typically do not control all annual weeds. Thus, there is a need for postemergence herbicides in
pulse crops. This can be troublesome because postemergence herbicide options are limited and
expensive in dry pea and almost non-existent in lentil and chickpea. Where postemergence
herbicides are labeled, it is critical to spray weeds when they are small (1-3 inches).
Besides reducing yields through competition, weeds present other problems in pulse production.
Some weeds can contribute exudates at harvest that stain pulses, reducing quality. Weeds also
interfere with harvesting. Kochia can grow to the size of small Christmas trees and can plug a
combine when in sufficient size and quantity. Wild buckwheat can wrap around the crop and pull
it to the ground. Wild buckwheat can also wrap around the header and make threshing difficult.
Pre-harvest desiccants such as paraquat are available to dry down weeds prior to harvest, but
desiccation effectiveness can vary with specific weeds, weed size, and environmental conditions.

Nematodes

The impact of nematodes on pulse crop production is not well understood and the presence and
differentiation of species within pulse plantings has not been thoroughly quantified. Surveys in
North Dakota conducted between 2014 to 2016 may be the most comprehensive to date. These
surveys found stunt and pin nematodes to be the most prevalent, and also confirmed the presence
of lesion, dagger, spiral, lance, stubby-root, and root-knot nematodes. (Yan et al. 2015,
Upadhaya et al. 2017). Note that these surveys do not necessarily reflect nematode populations in
other pulse-growing states or regions. Cyst nematodes (specifically, pea cyst nematodes), for
example, have been reported in Washington State.
Direct nematode damage in pulses has not been quantified. It is likely that nematodes’ primary
negative impact on pulse production is the opportunity their feeding creates for infection by
disease pathogens or infestation by root-feeding insects.
Nematodes move slowly in soil but farm equipment carrying infested soil can spread nematodes
to new fields quickly.


Based on work group consensus, the species believed to potentially be of concern are discussed
below.

Wildlife

While pulse crops might appear to be less susceptible than other crops to damage by vertebrates,
a variety of birds and mammals can have negative impacts on pulse-crop production. At planting,
birds such as geese and pheasants and rodents including ground squirrels and voles may eat
surface and sub-surface seeds. After crop emergence, rabbits and other foliage-eating vertebrates
can pose problems in pulse crops, especially chickpeas. Elk, pronghorn antelope, and deer
present a problem in some areas; elk have been known to wipe out entire research trial plots.
Growers who swath or windrow crops may experience damage by ducks and geese feeding on
crops. Growers within two miles of lakes and similar staging areas are likely to suffer more
damage from waterfowl than other growers. Growers have even reported problems with theft of
crop by humans who resell at farmer’s markets.


Significant and specific information regarding widespread damage by vertebrates is lacking in
pulse crops. It is unclear whether this lack of information is due to vertebrate avoidance, lack of
producer awareness, under-reporting, or a combination of issues including the possibility of
reasons not considered. Thus, pulse growers’ needs with respect to vertebrate pests focus on
identification and assessment of damage

Pest Rank Description Symptoms Chemical Control Biological Control Physical Control Cultural Control
Deer, elk, rabbits ( )
Squirrels ( )
Voles (Microtus spp.)

References

Burrows, Mary. Diseases of Cool Season Legumes (Pulse Crops: Dry Pea, Lentil and Chickpea).
Montana State University Extension EB0207. 10 pp.

Fungicide Resistance Action Committee website, http://frac.info

Insecticide Resistance Action Committee website, http://irac-online.org

Pacific Northwest Insect Management Handbook. 2016. Oregon State University.
http://insect.pnwhandbooks.org

Upadhaya, A., Yan, G. P., Plaisance, A., and Pasche, J. (2017). Plant-parasitic nematodes on
field pea and their association with soil edaphic factors in North Dakota. American
Phytopathological Society North Central Division Meeting, Champaign, Illinois, June 14-
16.

Yan, G. P., Pasche, J. S., Zitnick-Anderson, K., and Pederson, S. (2015). Plant-parasitic
nematodes on field pea in North Dakota. (Abstr.) Phytopathology 105 (Suppl. 4): S4.153.